LLC "Success" appealed to the court with an administrat

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 3 last one 08.04.2020
Refunds: 1

Uploaded: 04.07.2019
Content: S19-024.docx 13,56 kB

Product description

Success LLC applied to the court with an administrative claim for recognition of the Methodological Recommendations for the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) on-site inspections to be invalid. When considering the case, the court established that the contested act was not officially published and was not registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia. FAS objected to the consideration of the case, pointing out that the act is non-normative, and therefore there is no basis for its publication and registration. The court discontinued the proceedings, indicating that the claim is subject to consideration and resolution in the arbitration court.
Are court actions legal? What is the procedure for challenging regulations that are not published in the prescribed manner? Are there grounds for termination of the proceedings?

Additional information

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.

Feedback

1
1 задача2020-03-2
Файл проверен. Решение задачи присутствует. Отзыв ложный.2020-03-2 
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)