Forensics Practical answers 10 questions

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 266 last one 10 days ago
Refunds: 0

Uploaded: 23.06.2013
Content: 30623185750673.rar 10,61 kB

Product description

Practical Forensics, 10 questions.

Question 1. A citizen suspected of committing a theft from the premises and seized a bunch of keys. To find out whether there is among them a key that allows to open the lock of the room, the investigator made an experiment - in the presence of two citizens tried each of the keys to open the lock. Finding the right key, he secured in the interrogation of these people is a fact.
1) Is the investigator did?
2) What should be the actions of the investigator?

Question 2. Traffic policemen detained for speeding citizen present his driver's license in the name of Nikolayev. Technical passport of the car 2109 was absent, although Nikolaev said that it was his car. During the search of the passenger compartment in the trunk found and seized a knife with a blade switchblade and a plastic bag with a white substance.
1) What special knowledge should be used in deciding whether the investigator of a criminal case?
2) How can the investigator found out whether the car VAZ 2109, and, if it is not listed in the hijacking?

Question 3. Dworkin and Sergacheva fraudulently obtained from c. Ropareva 110 thousand. Rubles, promising to find a profitable option exchange his studio. During the investigation the investigator issued Ropar received from Dworkin and Sergacheva warrant for an apartment, an extract from the house, and the financial account, which raise doubts about their authenticity.
1) What types of expertise necessary to appoint an investigator to check the authenticity of these documents?
2) How to obtain samples for a comparative study of the signatures in the documents?

Question 4: At night from the safe office Moscow trade company "Vega" kidnapped revenues of 1mln.125 thousand. Rubles. When viewed from the scene on the door crack a safe found three tracks of fingers. When checking for criminal records found that they belonged previously convicted Sorokin, who lives in Mytischi. During the interrogation, Sorokin said that on the day of the theft was in the city of Penza relatives.
1) How to check the alibi Sorokina?
2) Is there a basis for conducting a search of a residence Sorokina?
Question 5. The day before the planned audit in rural store fire occurred. The hearth fire is indoors around a metal warehouse where he kept reporting documents and the rest of the day proceeds. As a result, the inspection found that the contents of the storage charred and incinerated.
1) Which versions of the cause of the fire can be put forward?
2) What should be the sequence of the original investigation?
Question 6. Lobachyov and acorns during the year made several thefts of parts and components of motor vehicles owned by the right of private ownership to residents of Smolensk. When these crimes Lobachyov and acorns used their car to travel to the site of the theft, delivery to autogenous system and transportation of stolen.
1) What kind of items can be attached to the case as evidence?
2) What measures can be taken in relation to the physical evidence in the resolution of a criminal case?

Question 7. When examination of the scene of the theft had traces of fingers on a window pane, a path of footprints on the floor and a cigarette butt in an ashtray.
1) What diagnostic tasks can be performed in the study of these objects?

Question 8: When reading the protocol inspection of the scene in the case of burglary prosecutor made a comment that it does not reflect the absence of a break and fingers on such basic facilities as doors, safety deposit boxes, empty bottles on the tables. The investigator said this, that no trace of it has not reflected, in order not to clutter up the protocol.
1) Is it fair to note the prosecutor?
2) In what situations must be specified in the protocol of inspection for the absence of certain tracks?

Question 9. Kolosov December 7, was detained in connection with the murder Melnikova, as he had f

Additional information

During the interrogation, Kolosov claimed that the murder of he does not know anything. Things he had found on the street, returning from the theater at night. December 10 the investigator concluded that the other evidence incriminating Kolosov a crime is detected and the charge brought against him was not.
1) What are the next steps of the investigator?
2) What should the investigator against Kolosov?

Question 10 on suspicion of committing a robbery arrested five students of technical college. The victim in the interrogation revealed that a good look and will be able to identify only one of the attackers. The investigator presented for identification at the same time all five suspects.
1) Assume there a procedure for the identification parade?
2) When the presentation is made to identify the photograph?

IF YOU DO NOT SOMETHING liked the work, the report indicates E-MAIL, we will contact you and analyze all of your claim during the day.
If you like the work, please leave feedback, this will help you to increase the product list of inexpensive but high-quality work.
Works in * .rar opens archiver download any free and open.


No feedback yet.
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)